The Narrative of Decentralization in Major Blockchain Networks: The Myth and the Reality

.jpg)
Represented by the Nakamoto coefficient, decentralization is supposed to be the core attribute of blockchain technology. The reality, however, is more complex.
How Decentralized Are Major Blockchains?
The decentralization characteristic of blockchain is what makes it unique among other technologies. But are the major blockchains we know really decentralized? Let's take a closer look at this.
Blockchain decentralization aims to eliminate reliance on trust among members and prevent them from corrupting the effectiveness of the network with their authority or commands. On this topic, you may have heard some discussions about the Nakamoto coefficient, formally introduced in 2017 by former Coinbase CTO Balaji Srinivasan.
Using the Nakamoto coefficient as a measure of decentralization, you can determine the minimum number of validator nodes required to disrupt the blockchain's network. The higher the Nakamoto coefficient, the more decentralized the blockchain is.
The Nakamoto coefficient is a way to quantify the decentralization of a blockchain or other decentralized system. It's the number of entities you need to compromise at least one essential subsystem.
— Balaji Srinivasan (@balajis) December 3, 2020
Original article: https://t.co/mHTWheLfsb https://t.co/CjVgfy2T0K
Srinivasan proposes that a blockchain comprises six subsystems: mining, clients, developers, exchanges, nodes, and owners. Each of these subsystems has its own statistical data set that must be considered when measuring the Nakamoto coefficient:
- Mining: The rewards users get for mining within a set amount of time.
- Clients: The number of users for each client
- Developers: The number of commits developers make
- Exchanges: The volume of exchanges made within a set amount of time
- Nodes: The node distribution across countries
- Owners: The distribution across individual addresses

Let’s look at some blockchain networks where they stand regarding the Nakamoto coefficient, using data from Nakaflow, Crosstower and Blockworks.
Bitcoin
Nakamoto Coefficient: 7,349
Area Highlight: Developer, Owner, and Validator measurements have high scores.
Validator Node Count: 14,409
Nakamoto scores tend to be the highest when it comes to Bitcoin. In general, Bitcoin is one of the most decentralized blockchains.
Ethereum Beacon Chain
Nakamoto Coefficient: Unknown
Area Highlight: Ethereum scores well in Node distribution. For developer and owner decentralization, Ethereum scores low to moderate.
Validator Node Count: 300,000+
Ethereum has such a large network size that its total number of validators cannot be determined.
BNB Chain
Nakamoto Coefficient: 7
Area Highlight: Low number of validators.
Validator Node Count: 21
The Nakamoto Coefficient of the BNB Chain is 7, around the median for major blockchains. By expanding the validator set with inactive validators, BNB Chain could ensure greater security and network reliability.
Solana
Nakamoto Coefficient: 30
Area Highlight: Solana scores well when it comes to Mining pools. However, Solana scores poorly for Nodes and Owners decentralization.
Validator Node Count: 1,875
It was Solana that popularized the idea of the Nakamoto coefficient. The Nakamoto coefficient for Solana is strong, thanks to its 1,875 validators.
Avalanche
Nakamoto Coefficient: 30
Area Highlight: Avalanche has a healthy active validator count as well as optimal node decentralization.
Validator Node Counts: 1,267
Decentralization has always been a priority for Avalanche. As its Nakamoto Coefficient shows, Avalanche is the most decentralized Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchain alongside Solana.

Despite its usefulness, the Nakamoto coefficient has some flaws. For example, a blockchain might score well for one type of decentralization, and another of its more important systems might be centralized. In addition, in some cases, Nakamoto scores are calculated in a short period or with an enormous number of users, lowering their reliability. Even Bitcoin, the most decentralized network, is dominated by a few large mining pools.
Besides the Nakamoto coefficient, many researchers also use Gini coefficients and Shannon entropies to estimate blockchain decentralization. However, those metrics largely align with Nakamoto scores for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Centralization Before Decentralization?
Early in a blockchain’s lifespan, centralization often precedes true decentralization. This evolution may be necessary for the next phase of decentralized networks to emerge. While centralization can provide stability to a young blockchain, sometimes there are drawbacks.
In a recent Twitter Thread, crypto influencer TyLucky called out Cronos Chain and its parent company Crypto.com for seeming to favor certain protocols when other protocols were also delivering results.
Why centralization under the guise of decentralization matters - 🧵
— TyLucky | Crypto YouTuber & NFT Collector (@TyLuckyOfficial) August 11, 2022
To be crystal clear, no FUD intended, I don't have a competing product or ulterior motive. I simply genuinely care about #crofam and for better or worse, I speak up when I see an issue. Plenty can attest.
Accordingly, it appears that more projects are looking to bridge out of Cronos than to bridge into it, he said.
I'm just one guy, this is just one guy's opinion, but in recent months, I've noticed significantly more projects looking to bridge out from Cronos than looking to bridge onto Cronos. Why is that? Not just 1 reason to be clear nor are the people I've mentioned solely responsible.
— TyLucky | Crypto YouTuber & NFT Collector (@TyLuckyOfficial) August 11, 2022
As we can see, many established blockchains are still not as decentralized as they could be. However, it’s important to note that blockchain is still a relatively new technology. Most blockchain protocols are still in their infancy, and many must continue to trade off decentralization for network stability.
Eventually, as the networks mature, they can become more decentralized or define their specific degree of decentralization.
This is a paid press release, BSC.News does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The project team has purchased this advertisement article for $1500. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company. BSC.News is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned in the press release.
This is a paid press release, BSC.News does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The project team has purchased this advertisement article for $2500. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company. BSC.News is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned in the press release.
Author
Related News


Ether Futures ETFs Hit the Market: ProShares, VanEck, and More Offer Options

This marks the first-ever ETFs based on ether futures, following the introduction of the first bitcoin futures ETF two years ago.
Summary
- A range of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) targeting the performance of ether futures have been launched.
- These offerings mark the first-ever ETFs based on ether futures, coming almost two years after the introduction of the first bitcoin futures ETF.
In a significant development for the crypto industry, a range of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) targeting the performance of ether futures have been launched. These offerings mark the first-ever ETFs based on ether futures, coming almost two years after the introduction of the first bitcoin futures ETF.
Renowned for launching the first U.S. bitcoin futures ETF, ProShares leads the charge with the launch of the ProShares Ether Strategy ETF, along with two additional offerings that provide a blend of exposure to both bitcoin and ether. ProShares’ CEO, Michael L. Sapir, expressed optimism about the appeal of these crypto-linked ETFs to investors, stating, "We think that many investors who are interested in cryptocurrencies but are concerned about custody risks, or who are challenged by the learning curve and complexities required to buy them directly, will be attracted to our crypto-linked ETFs."
Bitwise also joined the fray with two ether futures ETFs: the Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF and the Bitwise Bitcoin and Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF.
VanEck, a prominent asset manager, has also entered the arena with the VanEck Ethereum Strategy ETF. This ETF is designed to target capital appreciation by investing in ether futures contracts, providing investors with an alternative path to participate in the robust futures market centered around Ethereum.
Additionally, the VanEck Ethereum Strategy ETF has also entered the market, “designed to seek capital appreciation” through ether futures contracts. As highlighted by Kyle DaCruz, Director of Digital Asset Product at VanEck, these offerings provide a means for investors to tap into the robust futures market surrounding Ethereum.
This is a paid press release, BSC.News does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The project team has purchased this advertisement article for $1500. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company. BSC.News is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned in the press release.
This is a paid press release, BSC.News does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The project team has purchased this advertisement article for $2500. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company. BSC.News is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned in the press release.
Follow us on Twitter and Instagram!
If you need tools and strategies regarding safety and crypto education, be sure to check out the Tutorials, cryptonomics explainers, and Trading Tool Kits from BSC News.
Looking for a job in crypto? Check out the CryptoJobsNow listings!
Author

Try Now!

Sign up Now
Coming Soon

WIN BIG

Coming Soon

Sign Up Now

Earn Now
Coming Soon

Sign Up Now

Play & Mine!
Coming Soon
Editors Choice
Other Currencies
- nameLTBuyLitecoin
Sponsored
Buy Crypto with Fees as low as 0%
Buy Crypto with a bank transfer, credit or debit card, P2P exchange, and more. Not investment advice. All trading risk. Terms apply.
£0£0+0% - nameLTBuyEOS
Sponsored
Buy Crypto with Fees as low as 0%
Buy Crypto with a bank transfer, credit or debit card, P2P exchange, and more. Not investment advice. All trading risk. Terms apply.
£0£0+0% - nameLTBuyMonero
Sponsored
Buy Crypto with Fees as low as 0%
Buy Crypto with a bank transfer, credit or debit card, P2P exchange, and more. Not investment advice. All trading risk. Terms apply.
£0£0+0% - nameLTBuyBitcoin Cash
Sponsored
Buy Crypto with Fees as low as 0%
Buy Crypto with a bank transfer, credit or debit card, P2P exchange, and more. Not investment advice. All trading risk. Terms apply.
£0£0+0%