.png)
.png)
Rugs… too many in just a short period of time.
Well, people got experience from other blockchains and came on BSC for quick cash as it should’ve been expected.
The number of rugs has slowed down a bit in the last couple of days, but is it over? No, and rugs will never stop appearing.
But can we learn how to spot sketchy aspects of a project?
Yes! And that’s what we’re going to be discussing today.
I will try to explain in great detail the points I made clear in the tweet above, along with others that I deem necessary.
Okay, I’m taking too long, here is a table of contents:
When it comes to a new project I have a list in mind of what I should look for. I’ll first give you the list here and then we can discuss each one in particular.
Keep in mind that those are just potential red flags that should alarm you, but that doesn’t mean the project is 100% safe or a scam. I'll explain the point above in the "The most important thing" part.
This will be the first red flag I’m going to be discussing today.
Rushed projects appear overnight and in less than 12 hours (most of the time) they have:
I also notice that the domains are registered just hours before launch, a major red flag for me, since it obviously takes more time to prepare a great project, but it only takes a few hours to fork an existing one.
This one is easy.
Just go to whois.domaintools.com, paste the link in the search bar, and then scroll down to “dates” to check how old a domain is.
Here we’ll have to check the contracts.
Most often than not fly-by projects don’t even edit their forked contracts properly, leaving clues that the project is rushed and the developers are careless.
The example above is taken from the infamous WineSwap rug-pull, where the MasterChef contract wasn’t even fully edited and the developers left in the main names of the Sushi functions.
Maybe the first thing that comes to mind to most people is to check contracts, but I like to do that as the last task.
Checking how the overall website looks gives me an idea about how much the developers have actually worked on the project before release.
Here I can even decide if it is worth investing in the project or not.
I tend to take a brief look around the website, mainly checking for:
Let’s take this random project I found on Twitter as an example.
I’ve found this project on Twitter after I was tagged by CryptoDeus in a post related to it, where he makes clear his concerns about it and warns people it might not be that safe to enter.
I’ll be honest with you, after checking out the website I feel the need to wash my hands…
It isn’t mainly about it looking bad, but more about the fact that it is clearly rushed, and when you rush something you’re clearly only looking for the end-goal, ignoring the path along the way.
In this step, we’ll take a look at how social media is handled by the team.
Because I like to be extra-careful and cherry-pick the projects I join I’ll also take a look at the overall appearance.
Let’s compare one of the first tweets of PancakeSwap to the first tweets of “Phoinikas”.
You can see:
Overall a nice tweet. I like it.
Also, the airdrop (at least for me) is kinda sketchy. Trying to market the project even before it is released.
Airdrops are a common thing projects do, especially new ones. But for me it can be a red flag. I'd like to encourage you to form your own opinion about everything. You have to decide what is a red flag for you and what isn't.
Tons of questions that were not responded to, some people were even asking “when rug?” and people that sent their wallet addresses (for the airdrop) were being banned.
Here comes my favorite thing, social media proof.
When it comes to a new project I can forgive the not-so-appealing website appearance and maybe try to not be too harsh on the social media management, but I’ll never forgive fake social media proof (fake likes, fake followers, fake Telegram members, etc).
Buying Twitter followers and Telegram members is extremely cheap, especially if you buy directly from providers and not from resellers (Not gonna teach you how, don’t even ask. Never buy fake social proof, it only hurts your growth).
As you can see, you can buy 5,000 Twitter followers and 5,000 Telegram members for a whopping $20.30 USD.
Let’s first learn how a fake Twitter account (a bot) looks like.
Fake accounts are easy to spot, especially the really cheap ones as stated in the disclaimer above.
Fake Telegram members are also semi-easy to spot.
As you can see there is a similarity here:
Let’s also see an example from WineSwap’s Telegram group.
These are higher quality.
In the example above you can see that after mass-joining the fake accounts only typed “hi” and “hello”, clearly not natural.
But, what makes spotting fake social media proof extremely easy is checking the followers list as a whole.
It is easier to see batches of fake accounts rather than trying to pick them individually.
Let me show you.
Let’s take a look at Phoinikas.Finance’s social media.
Seems like they have 1,796 Twitter followers and 1,841 Telegram members.
Okay, it doesn’t seem like much, does it? Well, it kinda is if you ask me, but not as much to raise immediate red flags.
WineSwap raised so many red flags at first because in their first day they had over 5,000 followers on Twitter and over 5,000 Telegram members.
But, let’s check them as a whole, should we?
Let’s take a quick look at the accounts that follow Phoinikas.Finance on Twitter.
Okay… well, I think that’s obvious enough and doesn’t need to be explained.
Let’s check who liked their posts, those must be real people!
Okay… there is still hope on their Telegram!
Please be real people…
I think I just lost faith in humanity at this point.
I need to do something real quick…
I’m back, had to wash my hands a second time.
It is extremely obvious that the project bought fake Twitter followers, likes, and Telegram members.
Also, you can see a discrepancy when it comes to the engagement on their Twitter posts.
There is a clear discrepancy between the engagement the giveaway had and their other posts. Yes, a giveaway is supposed to get more engagement, but not that much.
Tip: If a random project that's one or two days old already has thousands of followers it should immediately be a red flag for you and you should start looking into it.
Anyway, at this point, I think it is clear that the above project bought some fake stuff to make it look more legitimate.
Let’s move on to other things you should look for.
Well…
I just came back home, looking forward to continuing writing the article only to see that the website “phoinikas.finance” now redirects to a clone of “turing.finance” (whatever that project is) and that they rugged.
Imagine rugging while an article about “how to spot a potential rug” is using you as an example of a potential rug.
Man, this world is wild.
This one is a bit harder to come through, but I felt like including it here.
Intrusive marketing is when projects use bots and/or fake accounts to “spread the word” about a project on Twitter on random people’s posts and/or tag a massive amount of people in a project’s post.
Let’s take both situations at a time.
As you can see in the picture above this fake account is trying to silently shill WineSwap in CryptoBethany’s posts.
This is a silent way of making people aware that the project exists, and believe it or not many people ape into random projects on Twitter, so this strategy is working.
Mass tagging is quite straight forward. Just a bot tagging random people in the replies of the project’s posts.
You can’t really save yourself from being tagged by bots as they tag people that follow another project or people that liked a certain tweet (since people that liked the tweet tend to be more active on social media).
Anyway, mass tagging isn’t as bad on Twitter as it is on Instagram.
Many thanks to Defi Khaled for helping me write this part.
Now, here we come to the real deal.
You can fake anything, but you can’t fake code.
When it comes to contracts there are four main things I look for:
Let’s take each one at a time and explain it.
A contract is verified only when you can see the green check-marks on its bscscan.com page.
When a contract is verified it means that the developer added a human-readable version that’s an exact match of the actual code.
Nothing more, nothing less. It just means that the contract you see it’s the real one.
You should immediately run from YF MasterChef contracts:
If you see the above, you can’t read it.
While every project has unverified contracts at some point (especially the ones with runtime logic such as games) you have to be very careful with it.
The MasterChef contract and other main contracts of a project should always be verified.
The same applies to non-verified contracts that are readable.
If a contract has the human-readable version but it isn’t verified it means that what’s shown to you isn’t the actual code, so the developers might be trying to hide something from you.
Here is how a mint function looks like on BSCScan’s UI.
And here it’s how it looks like in code.
A mint function allows the contract owner to create more tokens “out of thin air”.
The rugging method using the _mint function is when the owner gives himself a bunch of tokens and then sells them, bringing the price of the token to almost $0.00 USD and screwing everyone over.
No, absolutely not.
A mint function is needed, especially when tokens are minted every block for rewards (in the case of yield farms such as PancakeSwap, Thugs, Narwhalswap, etc)
Well, this is a tough one.
Always make sure there is a need for it.
Yield Farms and other projects with unlimited supply will always have a mint function because that’s what their project relies on, but if you’re trading a token that is supposed to have a maximum supply but it has a _mint function then it should raise a red flag.
A wonderful thing for tokens that have a maximum supply is when the developers set the owner of the contract to the dead address (0x00…dead) like beefy.finance did with their $BIFI token.
A time-lock delays the function’s orders for the time specified in the time-lock, and the call will be public on BSCScan until the execution of said orders.
Yes and no.
Don’t let Timelock be a buzzword; they’re only as effective as their usage, not inherent safety.
While yes, the calls will be public until the execution and anybody can read them you’ll also need someone to be constantly checking for changes.
Set up an alert on the time-lock contract.
You can do it by adding the contract to your watch-list within BSCscan and you’ll be notified via e-mail every time the time-lock does a transaction.
A developer can set the ownership address of a contract to the dead address (0x000…dead) and make the contract completely untouchable, but remember that this also means everything has to be perfectly done before the execution and that in case of an emergency the developers can’t help since they don’t have access to it themselves.
I prefer a trustworthy team and a time-lock rather than an untouchable contract.
The decentralized world might look scary at first glance.
It can be complicated, it requires a lot of research and most of the time there are going to be risks that come with it.
But should that discourage you from joining new projects?
Absolutely not.
Taking safety precautions and investing only what you can afford to lose is the way to go.
The thing that gets people stuck in rugs is greed. It is the idea of getting rich quick, going all-in in a one-hour old project thinking they will have those x100 gains overnight.
Be safe out there.
Stop dreaming about overnight success and focus on continuously growing instead.
Let’s re-cap what you should look for when considering joining a new project.
This is how I personally check out the projects.
On top of what I already said, as a final note, ask yourself the following: Is it too good to be true?
If the answer is yes, take a step back, and analyze the situation, assign yourself some limits, and try to be careful with it.
Stay safe!
You might also want to read: How To Keep Your Funds SAFE — MetaMask Guide
—
The Ape 🦍
Follow: Twitter
.jpg)
Incubation processes prepare gaming projects for launchpads by leveraging the opportunities offered by blockchain technology. Every launchpad on Binance Smart Chain (BSC) aims to connect with numerous communities by successfully pitching projects to target audiences and access project funding.
GAMI World is a launchpad and incubator platform that aims at achieving these goals. The protocol merges the gaming world with blockchain technology, connecting their community with leading names in the gaming and blockchain industry. In addition, leading names of gaming and crypto industries are involved in the unique gaming and finance (GameFi) launchpad as advisors, founders, and partners.
The platform's primary purpose is to provide blockchain-related know-how and technology for GameFi projects to help them reach larger audiences and raise funds to develop their projects. Therefore, the GAMI team and advisors put their effort towards creating a healthy ecosystem. In essence, they carefully choose the best promising projects to be launched by GAMI. The public sale of GAMI token will be on October 28th on their platform.
Many projects have little or no knowledge of blockchain technology in the GameFi industry, but have a gaming-based idea they want to launch. GAMI took a bold step towards addressing this issue by launching the launchpad and Incubation center. Therefore, projects without experience can leverage the platform to obtain the ideas needed to achieve desired growth in the gaming industry.
GAMI seeks to build the little shiny gaming ideas until they evolve to become top crypto gaming projects in the long run.
GAMI's core features are embedded in its incubation process, consisting of eight unique stages to develop projects in the GameFi ecosystem. The core features/incubation process include:
The token tier system on GAMI is fair for every IDO participant. Every tier has a guaranteed allocation, and the pool weights in each of them are balanced, ensuring that every user is satisfied with the number of tokens realized no matter the tier they fall into. In short, IDO participants do not have to worry about their choice of tiers because the pool weights would yield a decent amount of tokens to each and every one of them.
The token tier list includes Rare, Heroic, Epic, Legendary, and Unique:
Minimum Staking required: 300 GAMI token
Duration (Lock-in Period): 5 days
Guaranteed Pool Weight: 10x
Minimum Staking Required: 500 GAMI token
Duration (Lock-in Period): 7 days
Guaranteed Pool Weight: 20x
Minimum Staking Required: 1,000 GAMI token
Duration (Lock-in Period): 10 days
Guaranteed Pool Weight: 50x
Minimum Staking Required: 2,000 GAMI token
Duration (Lock-in Period): 15 days
Guaranteed Pool Weight: 100x
Minimum Staking Required: 9,000 GAMI token
Duration (Lock-in Period): 30 days
Guaranteed Pool Weight: 500x Plus Private Sale Access
The GAMI token public sale will commence in a few days.
Public sale participants belong to a tier according to the number of tokens they have, even though their tokens are locked. GAMI took to Twitter on October 22nd to announce the public sale and whitelist details. Users can enter the highest tier as it is still early.
“The time has arrived. The public sale of GAMI token will be on October 28th on gamiworld.io. Whitelist coming soon. IDO: October 28th. Listing: October 29th. Price: $0.1. TGE: 25% and then 25% monthly. Initial Market Cap: $253,125,” tweeted GAMI
GAMI will partner with YellowRoad and SafeLaunch, to launch the public sale on October 28th. SafeLaunch and YellowRoad are IDO platforms built on BSC.
The GAMI team is full of professionals with gaming and blockchain backgrounds who are aware of the pros and cons of the crypto ecosystem. In addition, they are well equipped to fix any problem that may arise. GAMI covers a large portion of the gaming ecosystem. The protocol focuses not just on Play-to-Earn games but also e-sport teams, gaming platforms, and influencers.
With its innovative tier system, accessibility, and guaranteed allocations, GAMI World would ensure that everyone participates in its IDO processes.
GAMI does not launch projects that they do not believe in by heart. The protocol’s goal remains to avoid projects without use-case. In essence, GAMI will not launch projects that offer nothing to the community other than providing tradeable tokens. They are entirely focused on delivering the highest quality gaming projects with real utility. Therefore, GAMI’s goal is not to launch numerous projects but to launch the right, promising projects.
To learn more about GAMI World, visit the following links:
.jpg)
Meme coins are going through the roof right now and it seems as if almost everyone is in on the action. However, before FOMO takes over you, you need to know that not all meme coins are built the same. Many really are only about the hype, but some are here to stay - if not flourish - into the future.
Little Baby Doge is a meme coin that could last for a long time, given the fact that the project goes beyond the speculative mania that drives most cryptocurrencies. Apart from it being a meme coin, Little Baby Doge is also active in the fight against climate change (a global problem that needs immediate action now and in the future).
Little Baby Doge (LBD) is a hyper-deflationary cryptocurrency project with a revolutionary reward program guaranteed to offer anyone in the Dogecoin family a plethora of lucrative deals. Built on the Binance Smart Chain, Little Baby Doge will offer its holders free BNB through its token burn process. The fun doesn't stop at that; the LBD platform also comes with a lottery, a swap and farm platform, and an NFT marketplace. Not only does LBD work to empower the average Dogecoin fan, but it also fights for a noble cause which is to raise funds for protecting the environment.
According to LBD's road map, Little Baby Doge is just getting started. This stage of growth will involve partnering with social influencers to inch the project ahead and increase awareness. Plans are already set for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko listings, not to mention promotional marketing campaigns to grow the number of holders past the 10,000 mark.
Given that all LBD holders will be able to earn up to 3% through instant auto-staking and rewards generated from daily transaction volumes, it is very possible for this coin to gain mass adoption within a short time.
LBD's strategic buyback approach is also a huge incentive in LBD’s capacity to retain value one year from now. Tokens are burned from every sale order thus discouraging whales from selling and encouraging holders to retain their diamond hands.
Add that to the noble cause of joining the fight against climate change with the partnership of influential climate change activists such as Greta Thunberg, and you have a meme coin ready for take-off to the moon.
To learn more about Little Baby Doge, visit the following links:
Let’s talk about how to spot a potential rug.
Rugs… too many in just a short period of time.
Well, people got experience from other blockchains and came on BSC for quick cash as it should’ve been expected.
The number of rugs has slowed down a bit in the last couple of days, but is it over? No, and rugs will never stop appearing.
But can we learn how to spot sketchy aspects of a project?
Yes! And that’s what we’re going to be discussing today.
I will try to explain in great detail the points I made clear in the tweet above, along with others that I deem necessary.
Okay, I’m taking too long, here is a table of contents:
When it comes to a new project I have a list in mind of what I should look for. I’ll first give you the list here and then we can discuss each one in particular.
Keep in mind that those are just potential red flags that should alarm you, but that doesn’t mean the project is 100% safe or a scam. I'll explain the point above in the "The most important thing" part.
This will be the first red flag I’m going to be discussing today.
Rushed projects appear overnight and in less than 12 hours (most of the time) they have:
I also notice that the domains are registered just hours before launch, a major red flag for me, since it obviously takes more time to prepare a great project, but it only takes a few hours to fork an existing one.
This one is easy.
Just go to whois.domaintools.com, paste the link in the search bar, and then scroll down to “dates” to check how old a domain is.
Here we’ll have to check the contracts.
Most often than not fly-by projects don’t even edit their forked contracts properly, leaving clues that the project is rushed and the developers are careless.
The example above is taken from the infamous WineSwap rug-pull, where the MasterChef contract wasn’t even fully edited and the developers left in the main names of the Sushi functions.
Maybe the first thing that comes to mind to most people is to check contracts, but I like to do that as the last task.
Checking how the overall website looks gives me an idea about how much the developers have actually worked on the project before release.
Here I can even decide if it is worth investing in the project or not.
I tend to take a brief look around the website, mainly checking for:
Let’s take this random project I found on Twitter as an example.
I’ve found this project on Twitter after I was tagged by CryptoDeus in a post related to it, where he makes clear his concerns about it and warns people it might not be that safe to enter.
I’ll be honest with you, after checking out the website I feel the need to wash my hands…
It isn’t mainly about it looking bad, but more about the fact that it is clearly rushed, and when you rush something you’re clearly only looking for the end-goal, ignoring the path along the way.
In this step, we’ll take a look at how social media is handled by the team.
Because I like to be extra-careful and cherry-pick the projects I join I’ll also take a look at the overall appearance.
Let’s compare one of the first tweets of PancakeSwap to the first tweets of “Phoinikas”.
You can see:
Overall a nice tweet. I like it.
Also, the airdrop (at least for me) is kinda sketchy. Trying to market the project even before it is released.
Airdrops are a common thing projects do, especially new ones. But for me it can be a red flag. I'd like to encourage you to form your own opinion about everything. You have to decide what is a red flag for you and what isn't.
Tons of questions that were not responded to, some people were even asking “when rug?” and people that sent their wallet addresses (for the airdrop) were being banned.
Here comes my favorite thing, social media proof.
When it comes to a new project I can forgive the not-so-appealing website appearance and maybe try to not be too harsh on the social media management, but I’ll never forgive fake social media proof (fake likes, fake followers, fake Telegram members, etc).
Buying Twitter followers and Telegram members is extremely cheap, especially if you buy directly from providers and not from resellers (Not gonna teach you how, don’t even ask. Never buy fake social proof, it only hurts your growth).
As you can see, you can buy 5,000 Twitter followers and 5,000 Telegram members for a whopping $20.30 USD.
Let’s first learn how a fake Twitter account (a bot) looks like.
Fake accounts are easy to spot, especially the really cheap ones as stated in the disclaimer above.
Fake Telegram members are also semi-easy to spot.
As you can see there is a similarity here:
Let’s also see an example from WineSwap’s Telegram group.
These are higher quality.
In the example above you can see that after mass-joining the fake accounts only typed “hi” and “hello”, clearly not natural.
But, what makes spotting fake social media proof extremely easy is checking the followers list as a whole.
It is easier to see batches of fake accounts rather than trying to pick them individually.
Let me show you.
Let’s take a look at Phoinikas.Finance’s social media.
Seems like they have 1,796 Twitter followers and 1,841 Telegram members.
Okay, it doesn’t seem like much, does it? Well, it kinda is if you ask me, but not as much to raise immediate red flags.
WineSwap raised so many red flags at first because in their first day they had over 5,000 followers on Twitter and over 5,000 Telegram members.
But, let’s check them as a whole, should we?
Let’s take a quick look at the accounts that follow Phoinikas.Finance on Twitter.
Okay… well, I think that’s obvious enough and doesn’t need to be explained.
Let’s check who liked their posts, those must be real people!
Okay… there is still hope on their Telegram!
Please be real people…
I think I just lost faith in humanity at this point.
I need to do something real quick…
I’m back, had to wash my hands a second time.
It is extremely obvious that the project bought fake Twitter followers, likes, and Telegram members.
Also, you can see a discrepancy when it comes to the engagement on their Twitter posts.
There is a clear discrepancy between the engagement the giveaway had and their other posts. Yes, a giveaway is supposed to get more engagement, but not that much.
Tip: If a random project that's one or two days old already has thousands of followers it should immediately be a red flag for you and you should start looking into it.
Anyway, at this point, I think it is clear that the above project bought some fake stuff to make it look more legitimate.
Let’s move on to other things you should look for.
Well…
I just came back home, looking forward to continuing writing the article only to see that the website “phoinikas.finance” now redirects to a clone of “turing.finance” (whatever that project is) and that they rugged.
Imagine rugging while an article about “how to spot a potential rug” is using you as an example of a potential rug.
Man, this world is wild.
This one is a bit harder to come through, but I felt like including it here.
Intrusive marketing is when projects use bots and/or fake accounts to “spread the word” about a project on Twitter on random people’s posts and/or tag a massive amount of people in a project’s post.
Let’s take both situations at a time.
As you can see in the picture above this fake account is trying to silently shill WineSwap in CryptoBethany’s posts.
This is a silent way of making people aware that the project exists, and believe it or not many people ape into random projects on Twitter, so this strategy is working.
Mass tagging is quite straight forward. Just a bot tagging random people in the replies of the project’s posts.
You can’t really save yourself from being tagged by bots as they tag people that follow another project or people that liked a certain tweet (since people that liked the tweet tend to be more active on social media).
Anyway, mass tagging isn’t as bad on Twitter as it is on Instagram.
Many thanks to Defi Khaled for helping me write this part.
Now, here we come to the real deal.
You can fake anything, but you can’t fake code.
When it comes to contracts there are four main things I look for:
Let’s take each one at a time and explain it.
A contract is verified only when you can see the green check-marks on its bscscan.com page.
When a contract is verified it means that the developer added a human-readable version that’s an exact match of the actual code.
Nothing more, nothing less. It just means that the contract you see it’s the real one.
You should immediately run from YF MasterChef contracts:
If you see the above, you can’t read it.
While every project has unverified contracts at some point (especially the ones with runtime logic such as games) you have to be very careful with it.
The MasterChef contract and other main contracts of a project should always be verified.
The same applies to non-verified contracts that are readable.
If a contract has the human-readable version but it isn’t verified it means that what’s shown to you isn’t the actual code, so the developers might be trying to hide something from you.
Here is how a mint function looks like on BSCScan’s UI.
And here it’s how it looks like in code.
A mint function allows the contract owner to create more tokens “out of thin air”.
The rugging method using the _mint function is when the owner gives himself a bunch of tokens and then sells them, bringing the price of the token to almost $0.00 USD and screwing everyone over.
No, absolutely not.
A mint function is needed, especially when tokens are minted every block for rewards (in the case of yield farms such as PancakeSwap, Thugs, Narwhalswap, etc)
Well, this is a tough one.
Always make sure there is a need for it.
Yield Farms and other projects with unlimited supply will always have a mint function because that’s what their project relies on, but if you’re trading a token that is supposed to have a maximum supply but it has a _mint function then it should raise a red flag.
A wonderful thing for tokens that have a maximum supply is when the developers set the owner of the contract to the dead address (0x00…dead) like beefy.finance did with their $BIFI token.
A time-lock delays the function’s orders for the time specified in the time-lock, and the call will be public on BSCScan until the execution of said orders.
Yes and no.
Don’t let Timelock be a buzzword; they’re only as effective as their usage, not inherent safety.
While yes, the calls will be public until the execution and anybody can read them you’ll also need someone to be constantly checking for changes.
Set up an alert on the time-lock contract.
You can do it by adding the contract to your watch-list within BSCscan and you’ll be notified via e-mail every time the time-lock does a transaction.
A developer can set the ownership address of a contract to the dead address (0x000…dead) and make the contract completely untouchable, but remember that this also means everything has to be perfectly done before the execution and that in case of an emergency the developers can’t help since they don’t have access to it themselves.
I prefer a trustworthy team and a time-lock rather than an untouchable contract.
The decentralized world might look scary at first glance.
It can be complicated, it requires a lot of research and most of the time there are going to be risks that come with it.
But should that discourage you from joining new projects?
Absolutely not.
Taking safety precautions and investing only what you can afford to lose is the way to go.
The thing that gets people stuck in rugs is greed. It is the idea of getting rich quick, going all-in in a one-hour old project thinking they will have those x100 gains overnight.
Be safe out there.
Stop dreaming about overnight success and focus on continuously growing instead.
Let’s re-cap what you should look for when considering joining a new project.
This is how I personally check out the projects.
On top of what I already said, as a final note, ask yourself the following: Is it too good to be true?
If the answer is yes, take a step back, and analyze the situation, assign yourself some limits, and try to be careful with it.
Stay safe!
You might also want to read: How To Keep Your Funds SAFE — MetaMask Guide
—
The Ape 🦍
Follow: Twitter
